Highlights

20 March 2020

Translation - Lezioni collettive di spada e sciabola by Eugenio Pini

Eugenio Pini is one of the most famous names in modern Italian fencing history, perhaps second only to Aldo Nadi. He was undoubtedly the first modern Italian fencing celebrity, with his name being known across Europe thanks to his high-profile fencing exhibitions, duels, feuds, and not least his renowned fencing club in Livorno, which produced many champions, the most prominent of whom being Giuseppe 'Beppe' Nadi, father of Aldo and Nedo Nadi.


Before he was quite so famous, while employed at the Royal Naval Academy in Livorno, Pini wrote a short book detailing his method of group instruction for fencing, according to the regulation method of the time (see Parise's 1884 treatise Trattato teorico-pratico della scherma di spada e sciabola). It is this valuable and interesting work which I wish to share with you all today, which is entitled Lezioni collettive di spada e sciabola ('Group sword and sabre lessons'), published in 1891 in Milan.

Translation: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L6-9_mY_VO_hCKblZWCgaPsBRuCSDfsf
Transcription: https://drive.google.com/open?id=15NGzanx-XT2MsegfZywFw98kljxxp9ZA
Scans: https://teca.bncf.firenze.sbn.it/ImageViewer/servlet/ImageViewer?idr=BNCF00003880056

With very little in the way of technical notes, this booklet is more of a pedagogical guide for trained fencing instructors. Although individual lessons were the more popular method at the time for imparting technical skills (at least in the initial phases of learning), Pini's text provides a valuable insight into how skilled fencing masters would impart lessons to groups without compromising the quality of their teaching in doing so.

With reference to Parise's regulation treatise, Pini divides his curriculum into 5 years (the same length as an officer's course at the Royal Naval Academy), with the first four years of which being devoted almost entirely to sword fencing. Here is a summary of each year of the curriculum:

1st year

Instruction begins with sword fencing only. Students learn basic footwork, simple attacks, simple parries, circular parries, disengagements and counter-disengagements, and feints.

2nd year

The instructor transitions to doing individual lessons with the students, who practise among themselves when not taking a lesson.

3rd year

The instructor continues in the same manner as in the second year, but also begins slowly transitioning only the most capable students into bouting, which they will be allowed to do in the last months of the year.

4th year

The instructor will continue perfecting the students' fencing individually, still only allowing the best students to bout between themselves and with the instructor. In the last months of the year, students will begin learning the fundamentals of sabre fencing through group exercises

5th year

Students will receive individual sabre lessons, whilst the rest practise among themselves through exercises and bouting. All the while, the instructor will keep a watchful eye on the students, correcting and guiding them to becoming skilled and courteous fencers.

4 comments:

  1. Hi, i'm an italian fencer, and i just discovered your blog while i was doing some research on fencing in the XIX century. I want to congratulate you for the quality of your research, you are doing an excellent job

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you very much for the kind words. I'm glad you have found my work useful.

      Delete
  2. Do we know who Pini’s maestros were? – MotS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He learnt fencing from his father, Giuseppe Pini, who served as an officer in the First Italian War of Independence and then learnt fencing as a prisoner-of-war in Austria. Eventually he returned to Livorno and taught fencing there for several decades, likely teaching something similar to Marchionni's system. He may have studied under other masters (I'd say it's likely that he did), but I have yet to see anyone else be explicitly mentioned.
      The reason Eugenio Pini's curriculum in this work follows Parise's method is because by teaching at the Royal Naval Academy, he was considered an employee of the military, and was thus obliged to follow the officially-sanctioned method.

      Delete